Lazy Blogging - Bush on the NSA Decision, via AMERICAblog
I just had to cut and paste this rant - hits it on the head . . .
Someone give George Bush a God damn fucking civics lessonThat's pretty good stuff, though I think he could have been more direct with his opinion . . .
I've had it with this idiot.
We've got the president of the fucking United States of America lecturing a US court of law that it's supposed to reach decisions NOT based on the rule of law, but on "the nature of the world we live in."
You God damn stupid fuck.
You have the nerve to claim Osama and the terrorists hate our democracy? They got nothing on you and your fellow "Republicans." Do you people even believe in freedom? Do you believe in the Bill of Rights? Do you believe in our Constitution? Do you fucking believe in anything other than your absolute power to do whatever the fuck you want like some two-bit communist dictator rather than the president of the greatest country on earth?
We live in a democracy, you incompetent ass - one that is quickly eroding because half the people of this country elected a moron to the presidency (twice) and now are so embarrassed by their vote that they refuse to stand up and demand an end to your idiotic reign of terror.
These are judges you're demeaning. American jurists. The people in charge of our laws. And you speak of them like they're nothing more than crap. You and your party have contempt for our entire system of jurisprudence, the entire system of checks and balances our democracy is based on, because you can't get your way 100% of the time. Well boo-fucking-hoo. We are a country of laws, you stupid stupid man.
The world in which we live is one in which the town drunk thinks he's the king of the fucking world.
Osama bin Laden is a danger to be sure. But the greatest threat to our democracy is from George Bush and his genuflecting Republicans.
posted by Dan at 8/18/2006 09:50:00 PM
3 Comments:
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Love it.
The only difference between that rant and the actual opinion is that the opinion is better phrased. The writer of the rant substitutes obscenity for analysis; Judge Taylor substitutes sound bites (or in this case wordbites) for analysis.
The opinion will be over turned. It's not even a close call.
At some point, the NSA program needs to be litigated, thoroughly, on the merits, with a competent judge (not a political hack) doing the writing. The president may well lose.
But this decision isn't that litigation.
Post a Comment
<< Home