Sunday, February 17, 2008

Koster Wants to Name Bridge For Ronald Reagan

I was over in St. Louis this weekend - my mother celebrated her 80th birthday with a great collection of friends, relatives and nieghbors. Happy 80th, Mom!

Did you know that there is a bridge proposed from St. Louis, Missouri to St. Clair County, Illinois? Did you know that Chris Koster, one of the Democratic candidates for Missouri Attorney General, co-sponsored a bill to name that bridge for Ronald Reagan?

What kind of democrat is Chris Koster?

My mother would never vote for a Republican, and she won't vote for Koster, either.

Labels: , , , , , ,

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

attacks... attacks... attacks...

You should be writing for People magazine or Intouch, I hear Brittany Spears is thinking about getting in the AG's race... Your posts are about as substantive.

and you know what? There are a hell of a lot of people both Democrats and Republicans who think Ronald Reagan was a great President. You may not be old enough to remember, but many many Democrats voted for him in both elections. It's not always the policies of a man that people retain nostalgic sentiment.

Tell Harris to attack Reagan in the press outstate and see how many votes he picks up.

2/17/2008 9:15 PM  
Blogger Spyder said...

Damn! I hope you didn't give her your flu!

2/17/2008 10:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dan "republicans kill babies, cause global warming, and club baby seals" cant understand why many D's, including a boat load of union workers, voted for and liked Reagan.

I guess it should be expected.

2/17/2008 11:48 PM  
Blogger Dan said...

If you're pleased that a Democrat wants to name a bridge after Ronald Reagan, then Koster is definitely your man, and I don't understand why you view my post as an attack/

2/18/2008 5:56 AM  
Blogger Dan said...

Hah, Spyder - don't worry about that. She's a lot tougher than I am.

2/18/2008 6:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As you probably know, Reagan was born in Illinois. Furthermore, the bridge goes from Illinois to Missouri just the same as it goes from Missouri to Illinois. I am guessing there is some bipartisan effort on both sides of the Mississippi to honor Reagan given his birthplace. Kind of Obamaesque if you ask me.

2/18/2008 9:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bipartisan??? Did you see that list of thugs who co-sponsored the measure?

2/18/2008 11:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Bullard going to send Koster's dirty money back or not?

2/18/2008 12:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Immediately following the Jackson Country Democratic Party doing the same.

(Dan, you do attract some truly stupid people here, don't you?)

2/18/2008 12:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dan you have a nose for controversy in your endorsements. Bullard and Mauer are more fun than Itchy and Scratchy so far.

2/18/2008 3:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Koster is a complete opportunit.

Check out his divorce.

Ask his ex father in law over in St Louis with all the connections what he thinks of Koster.

He'll be glad to tell you.

2/19/2008 5:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Divorce - is it Koster v. Koster, 2103FC-02782, St. Louis County, on Missouri Case Net, in 2003?

What the hell - the wife had to pay Chris Koster $650,000 . . . in 2003?

WITHOUT TRIAL- DECREE OF DISSOLUTION GRANTED NO MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE IS NOT MODIFIABLE; PETITIONER(S) #1 REBECCA BOWMAN KOSTER NOW KNOWN AS REBECCA BOWMAN IS ORDERED TO PAY PETITIONER(S) #2 CHRISTOPHER ANDREW KOSTER GENERAL AMOUNT OF $650,000.00; PETITIONER(S) #1 REBECCA BOWMAN KOSTER NOW KNOWN AS REBECCA BOWMAN IS ORDERED TO PAY COURT COST; PETITIONER(S) #1 REBECCA BOWMAN KOSTER NOW KNOWN AS REBECCA BOWMAN NAME CHANGED TO MAIDEN NAME REBECCA BOWMAN SEPARATION AGREEMENT; MADE PART OF DECREE; COPY HAND DELIVERED TO ATTORNEYS; NO CHILDREN. JUDGE JOSEPH A. GOEKE III, DIV 34 SOUND RECORDING: TAPE (C000) JUDGMENT NUMBER: 788239

2/19/2008 7:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was wondering when the divorce details were going to come out...that's just the tip of the iceberg

2/21/2008 11:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A lot of money she had to pay out for a marriage that wasn't all that long.

650,000 grand!

Ex Father in law thinks Chris is a REAL MAN.

2/21/2008 1:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

they were married in 1996...sure was A LOT of money, especially considering there was a pre-nup..wonder how Chris managed to get money out of her

2/21/2008 7:01 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home